Asus ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 09:28
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 265
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 796
76% 629 Pts
64-Core 1,001
62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 167
Reflection 239
Parallax 182
136% 196 fps
Gravity 146
Splatting 108
110% 127 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 737 5 49 54 57 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,412
Write 905
Mixed 862
SusWrite 159
185% 835 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 71.7
256% 91.5 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 225
259% 430 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 169%
Great: 242%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
573GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 430 432 433 452 452 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 444
Mixed 375
SusWrite 436
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 41.6
136% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 203
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 121%
Corsair MP600 CORE 2TB
114GB free
Firmware: EGFM52.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,586
Write 3,304
Mixed 846
430% 1,912 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 6
125% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 385
321% 460 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 442%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
169GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 296 299 300 302 301 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 444
Mixed 364
SusWrite 314
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 53.9
180% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 117 117 116 119 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 115
Write 87.7
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 116
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 23 23 23 23 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 81.6
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 24.3
40% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.3
102% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX4M4C3000C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 37.8
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 35.9
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING Builds (Compare 1,873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback