Viglen DX79TO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemViglen DX79TO  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DX79TO
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '22 at 12:18
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 179
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 538
54% 437 Pts
64-Core 649
40% 649 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.8% Average
Lighting 56.4
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 60.7
46% 61.9 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 59
Splatting 54.3
48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 76 54 66 87 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 374
Write 251
Mixed 170
SusWrite 79.5
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 1.2
9% 4.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 27.9
DQ Mixed 34.1
35% 59.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 94%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
107GB free
Firmware: H220115
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 227 110 84 86 85 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.5% Above average
Read 242
Write 233
Mixed 232
SusWrite 136
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 31.6
106% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 186
140% 187 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
835GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 114 114 116 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 95.6
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 114
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 140 138 139 138 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 135
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 138
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393930353435382D3033312E4130304C46 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.3% Very good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 28.8
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.5
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DX79TO Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

System: Viglen DX79TO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback