Honor NMH-WCX9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemHonor NMH-WCX9  (all builds)
MotherboardHONOR NMH-WCX9-PCB
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220331
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateDec 24 '22 at 12:18
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 49.3
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 109
42% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 385
35% 293 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Quanta(152D 1413) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.64
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 26.6
16% 20 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 19.9
15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1036 512GB
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21112000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 692 407 407 419 425 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 843
Write 844
Mixed 811
SusWrite 463
166% 740 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 22.3
73% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 372
266% 347 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTA4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NMH-WCX9 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Honor NMH-WCX9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback