Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '22 at 11:54
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 207
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 536
54% 435 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3399 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Lighting 91.4
Reflection 100
Parallax 88.4
74% 93.4 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 86.8
Splatting 78.9
74% 91.7 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0L2QEXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 554 337 337 337 338 337 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 2,177
Write 1658
Mixed 1,252
SusWrite 373
303% 1,365 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 74.2
247% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 927
DQ Write 781
DQ Mixed 840
633% 849 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 225%
Great: 247%
Adata ED600 960GB
225GB free
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 118
Write 64.4
Mixed 32.4
16% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 9.5
38% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.7
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 12.8
10% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 74%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
837GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 111 113 114 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 72.9
Write 92.3
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 113
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
99% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD GR2666S464L19S/8G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 27.2
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 23.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback