Asrock H470M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H470M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210129
Uptime20.8 Days
Run DateDec 24 '22 at 09:42
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 80.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 238
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 743
72% 595 Pts
64-Core 903
56% 903 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 115
Parallax 122
107% 123 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 98
Splatting 86.8
86% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HX256GSSDM2PCIE 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0521A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,539
Write 1,337
Mixed 1,050
291% 1,308 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 26.9
138% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 416
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 209
222% 364 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 170%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SC11
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 184
Write 176
Mixed 79.2
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
137% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H5AN4G8NAFR-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.8% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H470M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H470M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback