Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1503IA_M1503IA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1503IA_M1503IA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M1503IA
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '22 at 18:09
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 76.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 853
85% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 12ED) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.14
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 19.6
12% 16.1 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 16.8
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA007
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,246
Write 886
Mixed 800
216% 977 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 52.2
172% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 614
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 294
252% 381 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FF 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 25.9
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 20.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1503IA_M1503IA Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1503IA_M1503IA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback