PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3396 |
Memory | 2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190410 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 22 '22 at 20:28 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 53% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
59.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.56
|
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apacer AS350 256GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 69 115 111 58 94 MB/s
|
60.1%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
215GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 98 106 112 107 117 MB/s
|
72.2%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,044x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 973x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 402x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 383x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 336x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 209x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |