Samsung 850XAC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 850XAC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP850XAC-X01US
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '22 at 06:38
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 84
2-Core 116
61% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 415
50% 383 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Sanyo(144D C166) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.63
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.2% Average
Lighting 49.6
Reflection 65
Parallax 54.9
40% 56.5 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 54.5
Splatting 58.6
48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1365 1516 1564 1415 1460 1339 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,504
Write 1,534
Mixed 1,458
SusWrite 1,443
335% 1,485 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 42.2
143% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 588
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 134
152% 274 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 208%
Great: 564%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
35GB free
Firmware: CXB70K1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,282
Write 1,052
Mixed 662
221% 999 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 52.2
170% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 603
DQ Write 495
DQ Mixed 365
324% 488 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 01BA 16GU2X08QJLL42-12-K 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 22.1
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 24.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 850XAC Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: Samsung 850XAC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback