Acer TravelMate P214

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate P214  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Timpani_TL
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '22 at 03:22
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 59.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 196
65% 120 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 556
57% 459 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1490) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 18.9
12% 16.5 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 12.8
12% 15.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ256HBJD-00BTW 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 823 923 948 660 126 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,187
Write 1011
Mixed 950
SusWrite 606
210% 939 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 46.6
156% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 755
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 629
458% 604 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 159%
Great: 225%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
448GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 78 79 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 94.5
Write 94.7
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 78
109% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
167% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 12
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 11.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P214 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P214

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback