PC Recoil

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemPC Recoil  (all builds)
MotherboardTong GK5CP0Z
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '22 at 16:06
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 141
59% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 441
44% 361 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 105F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2756
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.4% Very good
Lighting 85.8
Reflection 94.8
Parallax 95.9
70% 92.2 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 78.9
Splatting 80.4
77% 97.1 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
811GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,515
Write 4,987
Mixed 4,692
1,060% 4,731 MB/s
4K Read 304
4K Write 254
4K Mixed 279
954% 279 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 731
DQ Mixed 841
634% 854 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 255%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
67GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,869
Write 4,864
Mixed 4,336
1,048% 4,690 MB/s
4K Read 343
4K Write 264
4K Mixed 293
1,035% 300 MB/s
DQ Read 991
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 916
671% 882 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
218GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,350
Write 4,919
Mixed 4,766
1,049% 4,678 MB/s
4K Read 359
4K Write 266
4K Mixed 281
1,045% 302 MB/s
DQ Read 1,080
DQ Write 779
DQ Mixed 903
682% 921 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 18
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Recoil Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: PC Recoil

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback