Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '22 at 12:15
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 65.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 221
70% 129 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 418
49% 382 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.45.36
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 20.4
10% 15.1 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 13.6
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 52 67 22 56 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 400
Write 164
Mixed 230
SusWrite 76.3
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 13.1
52% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 64.2
DQ Write 30.8
DQ Mixed 40.7
32% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 52%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
240GB free
Firmware: ES2OA90C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 73 73 72 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 73.1
Write 73.6
Mixed 43.1
SusWrite 72.4
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 46%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
330GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 62 62 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 86.5
Write 85.6
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 61.6
54% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5702-084.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback