Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HC
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '22 at 16:22
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 275
86% 162 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 818
80% 653 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 13FC) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2756
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
62.8% Good
Lighting 82.8
Reflection 79.8
Parallax 71.4
68% 78 fps
MRender 74.4
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 62.8
54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TB
825GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1626 1665 1656 1590 1403 391 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,535
Write 1,508
Mixed 1,457
SusWrite 1,389
332% 1,472 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 72.3
245% 88.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,082
DQ Write 835
DQ Mixed 925
701% 948 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 265%
Great: 289%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FN 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.4% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.7
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 16.7
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC Builds (Compare 4,101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback