Acer Aspire A315-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-41  (all builds)
MotherboardRR Metapod_RR
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '22 at 15:26
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 80.3
42% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 147
17% 133 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Acer(1025 1259) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13023.4001
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.45% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.17 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 11.3
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 480GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S190429a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 364 374 395 358 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 410
Write 354
Mixed 352
SusWrite 363
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 12.3
46% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 16.9
DQ Write 6.2
DQ Mixed 10.2
8% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P24HC4U1-BBGS 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.6% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 25.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 14.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-41 Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback