ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus GL702VM

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus GL702VM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL702VM
Memory	28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170428
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '17 at 03:17
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 79.4 1-Core 104 2-Core 194 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 546 59% 469 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1580) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Lighting 63.1 Reflection 71.4 Parallax 60.9 51% 65.1 fps	MRender 65.3 Gravity 58.6 Splatting 67.1 52% 63.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 239GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	268% Outstanding	Read 1,801 Write 1,719 Mixed 1,668 386% 1,730 MB/s	4K Read 50.5 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 65.5 242% 90.1 MB/s	DQ Read 420 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 191 194% 317 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 268% Great: 353%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1TB free Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 84 64 233010836 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2555 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 71 60 4306728887 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -107855218736446 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 189 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 55 454230043 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 14 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3545 (C2) HDA temperature 27 45 27 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 132413841736700 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4542524871 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2284249708 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	59% Above average	Read 129 Write 77 Mixed 57.7 65% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.49 122% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1315 CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 22.9 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 21.3 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 81.6 49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GL702VM Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

System: Asus GL702VM

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	416x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	443x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1x
RTX 3060Nvidia $246Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	93x
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 2,542 samples	43x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	19x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 8,819 samples	146x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	32x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 38%, 4,427 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback