Viglen VIG830S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemViglen VIG830S  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q170M-C
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '22 at 09:06
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 200
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 525
53% 430 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.5% Very good
Lighting 93.5
Reflection 94.6
Parallax 85.9
76% 91.3 fps
MRender 97.7
Gravity 84.7
Splatting 73
68% 85.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 402
Write 376
Mixed 360
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 39.2
128% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 275
222% 315 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
216GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 129 127 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 158
Write 150
Mixed 75
SusWrite 125
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A1K43BB2-CTD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.2% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 20.2
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VIG830S Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: Viglen VIG830S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback