HP xw8400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP xw8400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A08h
Memory11.7 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101025
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 18 '22 at 23:29
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5345
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 30
2-Core 60
34% 50.8 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 203
20% 162 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8491) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 1.8
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 159 149 165 213 193 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 210
Write 113
Mixed 151
SusWrite 180
37% 163 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 20.5
75% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 55.6
DQ Write 62.4
DQ Mixed 50.7
40% 56.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 100%
Fujitsu MBA3073RC 73GB
68GB free
Firmware: HPF1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 119
Write 118
Mixed 78.5
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.6
312% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 66%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
170GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 64 62 63 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 68.3
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 63.9
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
227GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 86 85 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 69
Write 75.1
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 85.5
53% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 60%
Fujitsu MAX3073RC 73GB
67GB free
Firmware: HPF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 82 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 81.7
Write 84.1
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 81.5
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.5
290% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6.7
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 4.9
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8400 Workstation Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback