Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 18 '22 at 07:29
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 32.4
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 135
42% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 184
22% 171 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 7
Parallax 4.3
3% 5.13 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 7
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Shiji 512GB 512GB
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0111A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 333 340 314 361 375 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 392
Write 304
Mixed 320
SusWrite 338
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 13.7
62% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 43.2
75% 141 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.2
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 241
17% 241 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback