Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	67.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
Motherboard	Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra (all builds)
Memory	25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20181204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '22 at 02:34
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Memory 59 1-Core 29.1 2-Core 54.8 32% 47.6 Pts	4-Core 98.8 8-Core 161 16% 130 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.5% Good	Lighting 31 Reflection 48.5 Parallax 90 25% 56.5 fps	MRender 250 Gravity 132 Splatting 174 149% 185 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$130 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 230GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 261 265 259 297 357 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 420 Write 361 Mixed 348 SusWrite 281 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 21.5 65% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 90.9 DQ Mixed 98.4 74% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 125%
Intel Optane+2.7TBHDD 16 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1TB free Firmware: 16.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 164 166 157 154 163 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AR32C16S8K2SU416R 4x8GB 327 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 7.7 18% 6.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 4.7 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 150%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $330

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	3,328x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,253x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $292Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	488x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	829x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	627x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	549x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	691x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	607x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	331x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	301x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	265x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	246x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16