Alienware M17xR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware M17xR4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M17xR4
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180528
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 17 '22 at 19:33
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 155
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 415
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680M
Dell(1028 0551) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5
Parallax 4.7
3% 4.5 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.7
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 43 29 140 136 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 349
Write 294
Mixed 275
SusWrite 116
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 6.7
28% 8.67 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 84.2
DQ Mixed 44.8
48% 81.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34%
Great: 56%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
462GB free
Firmware: 0005DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 105 106 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 79.1
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 106
61% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Nanya NT2GC64B88G0NS-DI 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M17xR4 Builds (Compare 672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M17xR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback