Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5095 1,699 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Memory 28 1-Core 46.8 2-Core 106 32% 60.2 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 210 25% 192 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.32% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 2.6 2% 2.83 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 3.8 3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.32% Great: 3%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Nf830 256GB 256GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: U1029A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 310 Write 233 Mixed 37 42% 193 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.5 14% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 67%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB 3,373 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 28GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 117 Write 32.9 Mixed 66.8 79% 72.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.6 84% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown WPBS26D408SWE-8G 1x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 6.4 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6.1 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 267 15% 267 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	72x
Celeron N5105IntelBench 37%, 1,007 samples	23x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	72x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	23x

RAM
WPBH26D416SXA-8G 1x8GBUnknownBench 37%, 81 samples	54x
WPBH26D416SXA-8G 2x8GBUnknownBench 73%, 33 samples	10x
BL8G26C16S4B.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 77%, 76 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16