Acer TravelMate P214

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate P214  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Timpani_TL
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220510
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateDec 17 '22 at 03:24
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 52.4
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 112
47% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 491
51% 409 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1490) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 21
14% 19.5 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 15.8
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 753 426 430 435 441 440 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,512
Write 1,515
Mixed 1,161
SusWrite 487
262% 1,169 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 44.5
143% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 314
233% 308 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 149%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P32NC4U1-BFJS 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 18.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 9.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P214 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P214

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback