Foxconn B75M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics83.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn B75M  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121124
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateDec 16 '22 at 16:09
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 142
60% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 233
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 105
Parallax 98.6
86% 103 fps
MRender 92.5
Gravity 101
Splatting 97.3
80% 96.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01b10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 185 191 203 206 206 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42% Average
Read 161
Write 212
Mixed 164
SusWrite 190
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 20.8
71% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 58.4
DQ Mixed 29.6
26% 37 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42%
Great: 99%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
322GB free
Firmware: 2BA30003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 49 48 48 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 46.3
Write 54
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 48.1
34% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR1870EC58E9F1333 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9G 0443 RMR1870EC58E9F1333 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.1% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 13.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.6
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn B75M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback