Lenovo 80RU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80RU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo ideapad 700-15ISK
Memory2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180614
Uptime13.1 Days
Run DateDec 16 '22 at 15:27
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 156
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 240
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 380A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4821
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.66% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 3
2% 7.53 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L2 128GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1L1QCXB7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1243
Write 673
Mixed 534
179% 817 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 43.4
148% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 530
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 412
307% 413 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 320%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
107GB free
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 121 120 116 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 332
Write 133
Mixed 180
SusWrite 118
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 25.2
86% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 145
108% 145 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC M471A5644EB0-CRC 6GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.5% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80RU Builds (Compare 1,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80RU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback