Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 16 '22 at 14:38
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 40.3
1-Core 22
2-Core 55.4
25% 39.2 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 335
34% 272 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.6% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 106
Parallax 99.2
84% 103 fps
MRender 91.3
Gravity 99.7
Splatting 88.2
76% 93.1 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 19 21 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 101%
Transcend TS64GMTS600 64GB
59GB free
Firmware: 20140516
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 78 78 78 78 74 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.6% Below average
Read 260
Write 78.5
Mixed 120
SusWrite 76.4
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 10.2
41% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 78.1
DQ Mixed 87.5
72% 106 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 68%
Samsung SP0411C 40GB-$22
37GB free
Firmware: UU100-05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 51 51 51 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 50.4
Mixed 30
SusWrite 50.7
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 29%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 85 86 86 86 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 81
Write 80.5
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 83.4
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 7 7.2 7.1 7.9 7.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 94%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
931GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 29 29 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 36.9
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 27.7
45% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-2400 CL10 4GB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.9% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 14.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 5.1
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO(Wi-Fi ac) Builds (Compare 991 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $688
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback