Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 16 '22 at 06:49
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 75.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 263
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 868
82% 678 Pts
64-Core 1324
82% 1324 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
201% Outstanding
Lighting 289
Reflection 284
Parallax 297
235% 290 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 251
Splatting 185
206% 263 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 201%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
260GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 498
Write 429
Mixed 426
100% 451 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 47.6
158% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
630GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,308
Write 2,166
Mixed 2,013
482% 2,162 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 73.8
245% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 874
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 844
626% 827 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 64.2
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
429GB free
Firmware: CC26
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14.4
Write 67.7
Mixed 25.4
27% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
372GB free
Firmware: CC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 129
Write 92.8
Mixed 77.4
74% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.9% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 27.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 25.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback