Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '22 at 22:59
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 70.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 271
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 905
85% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,419
88% 1,419 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 281
Reflection 282
Parallax 300
229% 288 fps
MRender 346
Gravity 249
Splatting 190
206% 262 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 197%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
166GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 436 420 320 321 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 443
Mixed 446
SusWrite 376
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 54.5
181% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2326 2265 2242 2324 2333 2337 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 2,447
Write 2,378
Mixed 2,243
SusWrite 2,305
528% 2,343 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 95.3
308% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,330
DQ Write 1,109
DQ Mixed 1,205
907% 1,215 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 389%
Great: 435%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 108 79 102 101 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 92.9
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 100
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
433GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 187 188 187 186 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 135
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 185
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
373GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 132 131 131 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 146
Write 101
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 132
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
64.8% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 25.7
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 25.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback