Besstar UM350

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemBesstar UM350  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR UM350
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '22 at 05:56
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 63.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 226
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 501
57% 448 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 20.2
12% 15.8 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 13.3
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 152 216 128 191 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 468
Write 297
Mixed 356
SusWrite 168
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 38
141% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 175
142% 199 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 98%
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GB
294GB free
Firmware: 21103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 907 433 436 438 440 439 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,538
Write 1,670
Mixed 1,300
SusWrite 516
282% 1,256 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 61.7
206% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 941
DQ Write 545
DQ Mixed 788
574% 758 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 190%
Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 24.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 23
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UM350 Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar UM350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback