| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Micro-Star GP72MVR 7RFX |
| Motherboard | MSI MS-179B (all builds) |
| Memory | 21 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20180905 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 15 '22 at 22:30 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
63.1%
Good
|
67% 115 Pts
|
38% 303 Pts
|
22% 349 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11D7) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9901
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.9%
Average
|
47% 71.9 fps
|
50% 61.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 852 840 830 817 797 MB/s
|
211%
Outstanding
|
349% 1,556 MB/s
|
190% 63.3 MB/s
|
344% 467 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC M471A1K43BB1-CRC 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
54.6%
Above average
|
54% 18.9 GB/s
|
50% 17.4 GB/s
|
50% 80.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-179B Builds (Compare 1,199 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-179B
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples | 863x |
| Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples | 286x |
| Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples | 628x |
| HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples | 416x |
| HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples | 154x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |