Lenovo 82ME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82ME  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220929
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 17:12
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 65.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 234
75% 140 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 599
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F9B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 22.7
16% 23 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 15.4
16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme IM2P33F4 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B114215 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 137 268 189 140 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 1,076
Write 240
Mixed 129
SusWrite 159
86% 401 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 12.8
78% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 113
116% 198 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AL1P32NC8T1-B8DS Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 23.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 16.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82ME Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82ME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback