Asus Z77-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z77-A  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 16 '15 at 12:12
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340-$278
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 181
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 348
46% 348 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 44.3
Parallax 38.9
38% 43.4 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 35.9
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150
91GB free
Firmware: 5.07 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 395
Write 229
Mixed 255
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 17.4
88% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 46.5
77% 149 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 491
Mixed 496
112% 501 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 34.3
116% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 113
116% 189 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 119%
Linux File-CD Gadget 4GB
3GB free, PID 1037
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 32.5
Write 21.1
Mixed 22.8
31% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 5.58
4K Mixed 6.62
461% 8.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 29%
Linux File-CD Gadget 2GB
1GB free, PID 1037
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
9.26% Terrible
Read 33.2
Write 6.65
Mixed 8.73
16% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 4.2
190% 5.61 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.26%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-031.A00LF 9905584-015.A00LF 99U5402-031.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.5% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77-A Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Z77-A - $144

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $580
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback