Fujitsu ESPRIMO E920

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E920  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3222-A1
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateNov 10 '17 at 11:07
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 221
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 569
62% 490 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 6.23
Parallax 6.12
3% 5.32 fps
MRender 9.38
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 7.57
5% 6.42 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
643GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 145
Mixed 171
129% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.29
89% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 112%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
118GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 170
Mixed 164
126% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.37
101% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 97%
Great: 97%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 75GB
49GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 160
Write 153
Mixed 151
117% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.28
79% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 90%
Kingston DTR30G2 16GB
4GB free, PID 16a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 40.8
Write 32.6
Mixed 22.6
39% 32 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 0.75
4K Mixed 0.64
87% 4.01 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.1% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E920 Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback