CDM P8Q77-M2

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago.

System	CDM P8Q77-M2 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P8Q77-M2
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1128 x 634 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140806
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '22 at 05:54
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 96.7 2-Core 190 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 434 49% 385 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% XFX(1682 9587) CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.2% Average	Lighting 63.5 Reflection 45 Parallax 89.3 52% 65.9 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 41.4 Splatting 53.4 44% 54.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 393 394 338 239 149 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 460 Mixed 340 SusWrite 318 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 46.4 155% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 332 258% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%
SSD 256GB 6,980 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 238GB free Firmware: HCS1A25E SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 182 200 85 85 74 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.6% Above average	Read 246 Write 230 Mixed 216 SusWrite 138 47% 207 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 54.4 4K Mixed 12.7 94% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 16.9 48% 102 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS512MLK64W6H Kingston 99U5458-005.A01LF TS512MLK64W6H 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.8% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 18.3 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 18.2 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Q77-M2 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: CDM P8Q77-M2

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	20x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	11x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	3x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	3x
MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 55%, 4,607 samples	2x

RAM
9905458-026.A00LF Hynix HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 6GBKingstonBench 29%, 8 samples	5x
9905458-026.A00LF Hynix HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 8GBKingstonBench 37%, 6 samples	4x
99U5474-020.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 99U5474-037.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 41%, 6 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $481

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16