Lenovo 10A7000MFR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemLenovo 10A7000MFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory12.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 14 '22 at 21:58
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 157
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 297
34% 266 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
MSI(1462 3355) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.56
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.3% Poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 26.8
20% 27 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 21.3
22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0809
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 22 25 22 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
427GB free
Firmware: AP25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 85 87 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 103
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 84.9
64% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 0820 1311 NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10A7000MFR Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10A7000MFR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback