Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4010U-$280 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 44% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Memory 11.4 1-Core 11.2 2-Core 21.7 9% 14.8 Pts	4-Core 56.1 8-Core 61 8% 58.5 Pts	64-Core 52 3% 52 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mz7ge240hmgr-000v3 00FN299 00FN302IBM 240GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CA35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 84 88 91 83 81 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.5% Poor	Read 79.7 Write 78.7 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 86 18% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 5.3 18% 6.2 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 99.1 DQ Mixed 115 111% 182 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 82%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 6GB free, PID 5786 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 13.1 Mixed 2 6% 7.55 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS256MSK64W3N 2x2GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 3 8% 2.83 GB/s	Latency 390 10% 390 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	1,465x
GeForce GT 720MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,823 samples	123x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	91x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	71x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	66x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16