bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '22 at 05:01
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G Graphics
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 61.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 302
90% 172 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 537
63% 490 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 30.1
19% 23.8 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 21.4
17% 20 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 70 67 70 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.1% Very poor
Read 125
Write 104
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 66.9
21% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 1
17% 6.07 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 1.3
3% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 82%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 40GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,615
Write 1,403
Mixed 248
239% 1,088 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 22.3
80% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 662
DQ Write 577
DQ Mixed 392
356% 544 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 4GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 21.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback