PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z97-E (all builds) |
Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160223 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Dec 13 '22 at 20:52 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
|
74%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LB3i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 150 150 152 154 147 MB/s
|
55.1%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$180
601GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 303 322 341 340 344 MB/s
|
80.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905403-401.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 275x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 181x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 72x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 151x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 48x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 40x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $648 |