Pcspecialist B660 DS3H DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemPcspecialist B660 DS3H DDR4  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B660 DS3H DDR4
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '22 at 19:50
Run Duration78 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700F-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 80
1-Core 190
2-Core 365
111% 212 Pts
4-Core 727
8-Core 1,253
120% 990 Pts
64-Core 2,146
133% 2,146 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 108%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Zotac(19DA 8617) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 209
Parallax 196
179% 208 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 149
Splatting 132
127% 159 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
1TB PCS PCIe M.2 SSD 1TB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0806A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,902
Write 1,520
Mixed 1,166
339% 1,530 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 29.9
216% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 944
DQ Write 1,038
DQ Mixed 584
552% 855 MB/s
Poor: 135% Great: 287%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 37.1
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 30.2
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B660 DS3H DDR4 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO

System: Pcspecialist B660 DS3H DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback