Lenovo 10F4S0JN00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10F4S0JN00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170308
Uptime13.6 Days
Run DateDec 13 '22 at 14:42
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 12.1
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 178
44% 93 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 317
43% 318 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 30BA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 2
0% 1.8 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 8.1
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4133101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 172 185 195 187 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 286
Write 219
Mixed 212
SusWrite 187
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 18.6
67% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 184
147% 208 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 3
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 385
10% 385 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10F4S0JN00 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10F4S0JN00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback