Asrock H61M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-S  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '22 at 12:17
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 174
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 288
40% 297 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$899
Nvidia(10DE 1455) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
166% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 252
Parallax 301
178% 257 fps
MRender 331
Gravity 234
Splatting 174
193% 246 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 166%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 75 85 80 84 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.4% Poor
Read 209
Write 185
Mixed 160
SusWrite 86.4
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 11.2
45% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 75.9
DQ Mixed 15.1
21% 36.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 70%
SSD Smartbuy 240GB
115GB free
Firmware: SAFM01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 180 198 159 96 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.4% Average
Read 219
Write 203
Mixed 134
SusWrite 171
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 24.7
68% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 78.5
DQ Mixed 31.8
30% 45 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
98GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 91 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 47.4
Write 52.1
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 91.2
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
400GB free
Firmware: AM001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 88 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 82.1
Write 89.1
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 87.4
50% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 2620 4TB
3TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.77% Terrible
Read 24.4
Write 24.4
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 25
33% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.1
50% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.77%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-S Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback