Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151022
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '22 at 12:49
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 424
55% 413 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 15.9
14% 15.9 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 15.4
15% 19.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1003 908 966 1145 897 916 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 2,136
Write 1,344
Mixed 951
SusWrite 973
300% 1,351 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 35.6
127% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 68.9
DQ Mixed 113
166% 333 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 203%
Great: 381%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
604GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 177 173 189 160 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 157
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 177
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Samsung SSD 840 PRO Seri 128GB
4GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 34 34 29 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.5% Poor
Read 30.7
Write 35.5
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 31.9
47% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 6.9
448% 7.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
2TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 64 63 68 61 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 64
Write 64.3
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 64.8
80% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAD11 CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAD11 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.9% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 24.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 20.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback