Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '22 at 21:02
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 131
59% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 350
35% 285 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Lighting 72
Reflection 77.5
Parallax 69.5
59% 73 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 71
58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 112 122 111 125 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57% Above average
Read 355
Write 118
Mixed 165
SusWrite 118
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 26
93% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 152
114% 155 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 57%
Great: 137%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
162GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 90 87 88 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 110
Write 90.8
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 88
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
60GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 102 98 102 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 87.7
Write 77.8
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 100
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
207GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 94 91 93 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 92.7
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 92.5
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
81GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 102 98 102 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 53.5
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 100
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
114GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 59 58 59 58 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 102
Write 61.3
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 57.6
88% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34%
Great: 43%
Seagate Portable 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2344
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 96 90 90 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 71.8
Write 92.1
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 93.4
114% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
177% 2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 10.8
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback