HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory25.3 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '17 at 17:31
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 186
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 355
47% 355 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
PNY(196E 1119) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 4.73
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 5.81
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 7.22
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
66% Good
Read 360
Write 300
Mixed 291
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 24.3
100% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 38.2
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 26.2
32% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 66%
Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
404GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 3.48
Write 74.7
Mixed 22.9
25% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.25
66% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16G-D3-1600-MR Kingston 9905458-020.A00LF 16G-D3-1600-MR 28GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.6% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback