Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '22 at 22:07
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 106 2-Core 201 73% 129 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 541 56% 451 Pts	64-Core 579 36% 579 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.37 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.3% Above average	Lighting 67 Reflection 71.3 Parallax 64.5 55% 67.6 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 68.3 Splatting 64.4 54% 65.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 29 67 5.9 59 175 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.9% Below average	Read 283 Write 226 Mixed 118 SusWrite 71.2 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 16.5 45% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 95.3 DQ Mixed 45.1 49% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 61%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 136GB free Firmware: UH5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 112 230 77 193 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 425 Write 296 Mixed 215 SusWrite 160 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 9.5 58% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 59.3 DQ Mixed 12.7 29% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 872GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 99 106 108 105 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	60% Good	Read 106 Write 129 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 104 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 BL8G24C16U4B.8FD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 BL8G24C16U4B.8FD 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.5% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 25.3 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 22.2 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	135x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	134x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	90x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	231x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	142x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	102x

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $757

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16