TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus GL753VD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL753VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL753VD
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180102
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 10 '22 at 21:44
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 188
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 524
53% 430 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 68.3%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1590) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 7.4
5% 15 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.4
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 6.01%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-128G-1006 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 36 35 37 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 89%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
924GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 107 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 108
Write 100
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 108
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 61.9%
 Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.4% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 71.4%
 Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GL753VD Builds (Compare 1,266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL753VD

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples1,002x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples264x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples762x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples501x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples2x
SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples159x
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples113x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples93x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples212x
76.D305G.D390B 1x16GBUnknownBench 41%, 6,956 samples157x
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 41%, 18,452 samples143x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback