Infinix INBook X2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemInfinix INBook X2  (all builds)
MotherboardInfinix EM_IC325_200B_V1.0 20211012
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 18:18
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 45.3
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 170
55% 103 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 208
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 6.9
5% 6 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 8.7
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFCB0.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 699 896 672 206 208 206 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 758
Write 729
Mixed 678
SusWrite 481
149% 661 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 41.5
147% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 567
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 466
345% 461 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 126%
Great: 214%
SDHC Card 32GB
1GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.1
Write 20.4
Mixed 15.2
24% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.3
69% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung MT53E1G32D4NQ-046WTE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 7.6
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical INBook X2 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Infinix INBook X2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback