PC Intel Lga3647 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemPC Intel Lga3647 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 14:15
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6134
CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 869
78% 661 Pts
64-Core 2,288
142% 2,288 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 302
Parallax 227
174% 248 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 205
Splatting 158
163% 205 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 156%
Great: 174%
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 110
Parallax 66.2
52% 80.2 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 59.1
52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
379GB free
Firmware: 02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 386 464 412 467 477 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 453
Mixed 317
SusWrite 439
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 32
113% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 173
175% 281 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 110%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
141GB free
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 201 202 199 200 201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 474
Mixed 296
SusWrite 237
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 41.5
146% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 252
212% 311 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 101%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2164 2173 2132 2098 1957 1545 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,054
Write 1,936
Mixed 1,365
SusWrite 2,012
414% 1,842 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 67.2
240% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1164
DQ Write 831
DQ Mixed 973
734% 989 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 323%
Great: 393%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965690-002.A00G 4x8GB
4 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.1% Below average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.5
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel Lga3647 Workstation Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

System: PC Intel Lga3647 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $611
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback