Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	61% Good	Memory 72.3 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 163 63% 108 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 430 43% 349 Pts	64-Core 425 26% 425 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4100M 1,157 User benchmarks, average bench 16% HP(103C 197A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.73 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Lighting 14.1 Reflection 19 Parallax 23.1 12% 18.7 fps	MRender 22.5 Gravity 24 Splatting 19.2 18% 21.9 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 353 341 348 346 333 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Read 424 Write 419 Mixed 378 SusWrite 333 88% 389 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 61.1 4K Mixed 41.1 131% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 260 222% 327 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 129%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 88GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 72 72 71 70 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 77.2 Write 85.7 Mixed 47.6 SusWrite 70.4 52% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 62%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50 5,600 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 315GB free Firmware: GN001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 40 39 40 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 58.2 Write 66.9 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 38.7 33% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ81UG8EFU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DB0-CK0 EBJ81UG8EFU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DB0-CK0 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.7% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 16.2 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	1x
Core i7-4930MXIntelBench 69%, 1,497 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K4100MNvidiaBench 16%, 1,157 samples	1x
Quadro K5100MNvidiaBench 21%, 641 samples	1x

SSD
0 240GBCt240bx5Bench 50%, 1,468 samples	1x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GBHynixBench 52%, 611 samples	1x
EBJ81UG8EFU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DB0-CK0 EBJ81UG8EFU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DB0-CK0 32GBElpidaBench 55%, 2 samples	1x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $209

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16