Lenovo 20E10011MN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20E10011MN  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20E10011MN
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210901
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 15:47
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 44.7
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 131
46% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 203
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620M
Legend(17AA 2225) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7291
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
8.94% Terrible
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 10.9
10% 12.4 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 12
Splatting 8.4
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS240GMTS420S 240GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 48 47 50 30 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 323
Write 302
Mixed 297
SusWrite 73.3
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 15.3
62% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 41
71% 136 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
666GB free
Firmware: JU004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 131 130 131 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 116
Write 144
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 130
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
230% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20E10011MN Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20E10011MN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback