Lenovo 10M9000CUK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemLenovo 10M9000CUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3102
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 13:10
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 238
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 614
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 75.4
184% 75.4 fps
Poor: 135% Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1L2QEXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 326 326 324 327 299 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1859
Write 1,395
Mixed 1,045
SusWrite 343
258% 1,160 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 52
170% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 588
DQ Write 426
DQ Mixed 526
388% 513 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 171%
Great: 247%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 406 416 418 419 408 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 449
Write 383
Mixed 382
SusWrite 408
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 20.8
89% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 40.7
87% 174 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 32GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
70.3% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 22.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10M9000CUK Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10M9000CUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback