Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V GENE  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1862 x 1036 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 11:27
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 96.9
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 173
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 466
50% 395 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 38.1
30% 38.4 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 27.5
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$70
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 445 446 477 479 471 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 388
Write 464
Mixed 348
SusWrite 444
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 31
132% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 253
213% 311 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-2400 CL10 4GB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 24.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 22.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 50.7
79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback